Should Your Content Aim for Traffic or Conversion
Which type of content attracts reader attention… bringing you more traffic and more eyeballs on the page? Which type of content converts… bringing you more customers and sales? And how do you roll out a strategy that maximizes the twin impact of attraction and conversion?
Easy answer… head to your local newsstand. The best attraction and conversion techniques are hidden between the pages of two very different magazines: Cosmopolitan and The New Yorker.
Cosmopolitan articles attract
Why does a Cosmo-type article attract more attention…
- 75 Crazy-Hot Moves with Your Man
- 10 Cheap Fun Date Ideas
- Lose 10 Lbs. in 10 Days…eating all you want
We find it impossible to walk past anything that gives us seven, seventeen or seven hundred ways to do or achieve something. We’re greedy, and we’re attracted to articles that feed our lust for excess – even excess information.
Most of the articles are just bullet points stacked up against each other that go on forever. Sometimes there’s some meat to the bullet points, but often (especially in Cosmo) it’s just bullet points. This of course gives you the feeling that you’re learning something – and you are – but there’s no depth to the knowledge. Cosmo-type articles are light reading. And we like light reading.
In case you’re thinking attraction is strictly a women’s-interest magazine strategy, you’ll find men’s magazines do it too. Men’s Health and Money always includes light-reading articles on their covers like “How to Get Rock-Hard Abs” and “7 Secrets to a Richer Retirement.” In fact, for years Men’s Health ran essentially the same four covers over and over again. They figured out the headlines and formats that were most effective and they just kept running the same ones.
Add light reading and a huge list together and what do you get? The promise of a lot of information without putting much work in to get it.
No wonder we find them so attractive. Cosmo-style content gets retweeted, shared on Facebook and sent around all the other social media channels more often – because everyone knows other people are attracted to this kind of format. And by sending it on, it makes the person who posted it seem more attractive by association.
If you create content that offers Cosmopolitan-style headlines and light, easy-reading body copy, you will get the same results that Cosmo has gotten for decades on end. And those results are very good indeed.
New Yorker articles convert
The New Yorker produces in-depth, well-written articles that drive home a specific point. When you write content in that same style, you impress the heck out of your reader. They see you’re smart. They see you know what’s going on. And they see you can tell them something they don’t already know.
That impression is so powerful that the reader is compelled to investigate further to see what else you can tell them. The more in-depth content they find, the more they think you’re a smart person to check in with often – and the harder it is for them to resist the “subscribe” or “buy” button.
This doesn’t just apply to text, but to video and audio as well. An in-depth piece in text, audio or video sucks you in. The more time you spend reading, listening or watching something, the more likely you are to follow up with the source.
Those of you who have read the back-of-magazine articles at The New Yorker might be worried this means you have to write incredibly long articles. You don’t. Being interesting is far more important than going on and on about a topic, and even The New Yorker has plenty of short pieces that still offer great insight.
For a New Yorker-type article, you need depth, detail and analysis. Those three things empower your reader a lot more than Cosmo-style fluff. Put more in-depth detail and analysis in your writing, and you’ll see your conversion rates skyrocket.
So which is the best strategy?
It depends on you, of course. Your free offers… or your website- just like some print publications – are driven almost entirely by Cosmopolitan-style headlines and copy. Others are driven by the New Yorker style. But you don’t actually have to choose.
You’ll notice that even Cosmo includes at least one in-depth article per issue. And The New Yorker always has a couple of short, lighter items up front.
You can use both of these strategies at the same time. And you should. A strategic mixture of both types of content will not only attract a larger number of clients, but also get you much greater conversion. You can also interlink content, so that Cosmo-style content leads to more in-depth New Yorker-type content. Or a Cosmo-influenced headline can pull the reader into a piece with more depth than Cosmopolitan ever dreamed of.
In print, magazines normally separate the two styles. The front of the magazine has mostly short, light pieces; the back has longer, more in-depth pieces. Online, you get to be more flexible. You can drive them from light material to deeper, more detailed content so they get a brilliant mix of both kinds of pieces (you’ll get great SEO benefits, too). They’ll be more attracted to you at the same time they’re inclined to convert and check in with you daily.
If you want to attract attention (that means more traffic, more readers, and more social media sharing), go with Cosmo-style articles. At a minimum, make sure you’ve crafted a drop-dead attention-grabbing headline. If you want conversion (that means subscribers and paying customers), lean toward New Yorker-influenced articles, with plenty of depth, detail, and thoughtful analysis. And if you want both, give your readers both. Why settle for just one approach?
